I just noticed that I (among four others) was the "top reviewer of all time" on cs.meta, with one review (which I don't even recall making). Does this seem as pointless to you as it does to me? Do we really need a review queue here? Do we really need a review queue on any meta site? Should I be asking this on SE.meta? Should I even care?
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
5
-
$\begingroup$ it is probably more difficult to turn this feature off, than let it be.. $\endgroup$– Ran G.Commented Jun 24, 2015 at 1:23
-
2$\begingroup$ answer: no, you shouldnt care $\endgroup$– vznCommented Jun 24, 2015 at 1:28
-
2$\begingroup$ Heh. Any chance that ether of you would turn these into answers so that I could go back to the queue and recommend deletion? I need to stay on top of the all-time reviewers list. $\endgroup$– Rick DeckerCommented Jun 24, 2015 at 1:33
-
2$\begingroup$ Shouldn't this be on meta.meta.cs.SE? $\endgroup$– Raphael ModCommented Jun 24, 2015 at 6:06
-
$\begingroup$ @Raphael the meta site for meta is meta, with meta as the applicable tag $\endgroup$– Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' ModCommented Jun 24, 2015 at 7:33
Add a comment
|
2 Answers
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
Meta sites just use the SE software (with some modifications), for better or worse. So it figures there'd be a review queue. I agree that they could be turned off here.
They are probably necessary on sites with more Meta volume, though. meta.SO, for instance, has more traffic than our main site.
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
Meta has question closure and tag wikis like anywhere else. Why would we turn the queues off here?
answered Jun 24, 2015 at 7:36
Gilles 'SO- stop being evil'ModGilles 'SO- stop being evil'
44k3 gold badges33 silver badges63 bronze badges