2
$\begingroup$

I just noticed that I (among four others) was the "top reviewer of all time" on cs.meta, with one review (which I don't even recall making). Does this seem as pointless to you as it does to me? Do we really need a review queue here? Do we really need a review queue on any meta site? Should I be asking this on SE.meta? Should I even care?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ it is probably more difficult to turn this feature off, than let it be.. $\endgroup$ – Ran G. Jun 24 '15 at 1:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ answer: no, you shouldnt care $\endgroup$ – vzn Jun 24 '15 at 1:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Heh. Any chance that ether of you would turn these into answers so that I could go back to the queue and recommend deletion? I need to stay on top of the all-time reviewers list. $\endgroup$ – Rick Decker Jun 24 '15 at 1:33
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Shouldn't this be on meta.meta.cs.SE? $\endgroup$ – Raphael Jun 24 '15 at 6:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Raphael the meta site for meta is meta, with meta as the applicable tag $\endgroup$ – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Jun 24 '15 at 7:33
3
$\begingroup$

Meta sites just use the SE software (with some modifications), for better or worse. So it figures there'd be a review queue. I agree that they could be turned off here.

They are probably necessary on sites with more Meta volume, though. meta.SO, for instance, has more traffic than our main site.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Meta has question closure and tag wikis like anywhere else. Why would we turn the queues off here?

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .