There are at least three tags that refer to databases: databases, database-theory, and dbms. The tag dbms is hardly used, but the other two are both reasonably common.
Should we merge all three of them?
There are at least three tags that refer to databases: databases, database-theory, and dbms. The tag dbms is hardly used, but the other two are both reasonably common.
Should we merge all three of them?
I looked at the questions with dbms, and all of them were about databases. Since I saw no one disagreeing with this part of the proposal, I went ahead with merging them and making dbms a synonym of databases
As for databases vs. database-theory, we could merge databases into database-theory without making a synonym. This means that all current questions tagged with databases will be retagged into database-theory, but since the tags are not synonyms, it is still possible to tag a question with databases without being part of database-theory.
However, it seems to me that as a tag, databases and database-theory provide about the same information about the question, and this is reflected in most of the questions in this tag. So I instead suggest to both merge and synonymize databases into database-theory, because this seems to reflects the usage of the tags the best. (maybe the tag description could also be updated...) I can go ahead and perform this merge once I see enough support (i.e. votes or comments) for this decision.