Why does a question like "What are all the possible types of output from a computer" deemed unfit here?

Question

In the past, I asked the following or similar question here:

What are all the possible types of output from a computer?

I am trying to understand what are the general types of output of a computer.
I assume the following described general types of output are the only ones in the cosmos, but I might be wrong:

• Screened Raw Data: Output such as a document available only to be read but not edited (as when opened with a reading-only "viewer" program)
• Screened Interface: Output such as a document available to be both read and edited (as when opened with a text editor)
• Spatial Change: Output such as the result of a computerized machine, or alternatively, a computer embedded system (such as a robot and maybe also quantum computer or some physical yet non material computer of some sort)

_{A similar try is defining what are the only possible ways to input data into computer, such as with CLUI, TUI, GUI and possibly other methods.}

What are all the possible types of output from a computer?

That is to ask: Is there a consensus among computer scientists and/or UX researchers about what are the general types of output of a computer?

I recall that the question was closed and to save it from being automatically deleted I published it in UX SE and got an answer which I accepted:

• https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/130346/general-types-of-output-of-a-computer

Why does a question like "What are all the possible types of output from a computer" deemed unfit here?

Answer 1

It's kind of a philosophical formulation of the question maybe.

I'd answer it as:

Like in every encoder-decoder system, the output of the computer is processed data encoded and sent as a signal to the decoding reciever. A signal can be classified into 5 categories, one for each of the 5 senses which we use as perception tools. A multiclass perceptron can be used to model the classification process of the brain.