There are some problems beyond what Raphael said:
This is not a blog, if you do more than 20 edits it is a problem on its own.
When you find that something was not obvious or omitted in the question, please, do not make partial answer in the question via numerous edits.
Proof by contradiction is not frowned upon, it is a general problem that when you have all the tools and all the knowledge and pick one proving technique, it is simply request "do that work for me, the way I have imagined", so it is no longer a question, point blank request in sugar coating.
Showing one or two examples does not constitute definition. The amount of work and time spent on your project is irrelevant, we can only work with textual description that you give us, we have no clue what you have learned and where are your difficulties and obstacles in the project. You want answers, we do not want (or like) to guess what is the question really about, incremental improvements do not work for us, at least not the way that more than 100 revisions among several questions are placed. Since this didn't help, it is a high time to change something.
This site should serve as the knowledge vault, Q&A, but there are things that are off-topic here:
Science advancements, one-on-one tutoring, too localized questions that are important only to you.
If people are not interested in your post, well, it happens, but it does not pose meta discussion thread yet.