Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 23, 2017 at 12:37 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:48 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://cs.stackexchange.com/ with https://cs.stackexchange.com/
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:32 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://cstheory.stackexchange.com/ with https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.cstheory.stackexchange.com/ with https://cstheory.meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 8, 2012 at 2:43 answer added Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' timeline score: 3
Mar 8, 2012 at 1:47 answer added jmad timeline score: 2
Mar 7, 2012 at 21:23 comment added Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' @bitmask No, on the contrary, now is the ideal time. What's discouraged is artificial questions; my question is absolutely not artificial (I struggled with that a few years ago, and I think there's an answer on the Internet but spread over several Coq mailing list posts, so it's worth having somewhere, on SO if not here).
Mar 7, 2012 at 21:09 comment added bitmask Aren't "test questions" explicitly discouraged for young betas?
Mar 7, 2012 at 19:44 answer added Stéphane Gimenez timeline score: 1
Mar 7, 2012 at 19:35 comment added Kaveh There is also the option to close too specific questions as "too localized": "This question is unlikely to ever help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet." so we may not need to make them off-topic as a category.
Mar 7, 2012 at 17:47 comment added Raphael I agree with your assessment. I think the same rules as for programming apply: questions that are useful no matter what proof assisstant I use are good, too specific ones are bad.
Mar 7, 2012 at 17:38 history asked Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' CC BY-SA 3.0