Timeline for Towards a homework policy
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:48 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://cs.stackexchange.com/ with https://cs.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 17, 2012 at 0:33 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Mod | @miquelramirez Since this thread happened, we held a referendum and adopted Raphael's proposal. | |
| Jul 16, 2012 at 23:46 | comment | added | Miquel Ramirez | I agree with this. I'd just like to add this: "There is no homework policy. But there are some common sense guidelines for handling homework questions." | |
| Jun 18, 2012 at 12:15 | comment | added | Raphael Mod | We agree, then. | |
| Jun 18, 2012 at 7:27 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Mod | @Raphael If the asker asked for a hint and an answer goes straight to the point without explaining how to get there, it's not a good answer to the question as asked, and pointing it out is fine. But if the asker wasn't explicitly requesting a hint and someone comments “-1 for giving a complete solution to a homework problem”, I'll delete the comment and go hard on the commenter. | |
| Jun 18, 2012 at 7:08 | comment | added | Raphael Mod | But for the last item, I think this is in intent and effect almost equivalent to my proposal, worded differently. What do you mean by "reproach"; is it fair to ask answerers to respect the asker's wishes, or edit the post to the hint + details-in-spoiler format? | |
| Jun 18, 2012 at 0:57 | history | answered | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil'Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |